Hawaiian · Kanaka ʻŌiwi

ʻohana

prononc. « o-HA-na »

Hawaiian word (*ʻōlelo Hawaiʻi*): the extended family, the basic unit of ancient Hawaiian society and economy. George Kanahele describes it as the fundamental unit of the *ahupuaʻa*, the land division stretching from the mountains to the sea: *« the fundamental unit of an ahupuaʻa was the commoner's extended family, or ʻohana »*. Made up of several households (*hale*) bringing together parents, children, and attached kin, led by the *haku*—the eldest male of the primary branch—the *ʻohana* was not merely an emotional bond: it was a collective subsistence enterprise, tied to a specific place and land, governed by values of cooperation (*laulima*) and mutual aid (*kokua*).

With regard to its socioeconomic organization, the fundamental unit of an ahupua'a was the commoner's extended family, or 'ohana.
George Kanahele, Kū Kanaka — Stand Tall: A Search for Hawaiian Values, Chapitre « The Relevance of Primal Economics », p. 320 (citation en anglais, langue d'écriture de l'auteur). University of Hawaiʻi Press, 1986 · trans. rendu français maison (œuvre en anglais, courtes citations attribuées)

George Kanahele places the ʻohana at the heart of the ancient Hawaiian economy, at the scale of the ahupuaʻa—that land division stretching from mountain to sea—the same landmark that defines each person’s kuleana. « With regard to its socioeconomic organization, the fundamental unit of an ahupua’a was the commoner’s extended family, or ‘ohana »—on a socioeconomic level, he writes, the foundational unit of an ahupuaʻa was the commoner’s extended family, the ʻohana.

This family is no loose circle of affection. It consists of multiple households, hale, each equivalent to a nuclear family with its dependents and helpers, united under the authority of the haku, the eldest male of the senior branch, tasked with holding together the rhythm and spirit of the family enterprise. Kanahele sees it as a fully-fledged economy—cooperation, laulima, “many hands”; mutual aid, kokua; unconditional loyalty to one’s own—a unit of production as much as kinship, tied to its land and responsible for its own subsistence.

This ʻohana is not the Māori whanaungatanga described by Hirini Moko Mead—that web of relationships and reciprocal obligations extending beyond blood kinship to include anyone who has shared the experience. Kanahele’s ʻohana is first and foremost a concrete unit, bound to a place and collective production; whanaungatanga is primarily a relational principle, expandable beyond blood and without a fixed productive tie. Two Polynesian peoples, two ways of holding family together: here through the shared labor of the land, as in aloha ʻāina, which makes it a nurturing ancestor; there through the duty of presence and support.

← back to the lexicon